|
Reply
From: <mjr36@cam.ac.uk>
To: "ivor catt" <icatt@btinternet.com>
Cc: <carol.gray@royalsoc.ac.uk>
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2006 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: Letter to Lord Rees
Dear Mr Catt,
I owe you an apology for not having responded earlier to your letter.
I shall however need to get 'up to speed' on the scientific question
you raise before being able to respond intelligently -- I doubt
that I can offer any input beyond what you can get from the better-qualified
Fellows of Trinity.
It was a great pleasure to meet you when you came to the College.
Best regards
Martin Rees
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
From: "ivor catt" <icatt@btinternet.com>
To: <mjr36@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: <carol.gray@royalsoc.ac.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 9:24 PM
Dear Lord Rees,
Please find my reply at w.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/66e.htm
which begins; "Dear Lord Rees, Thank you for your email dated
6 August 2006, in reply to my email and letter dated 5 June 2006.
.... There is no need for you to get 'up to speed' on the scientific
question. I approached you in your administrative capacity only.
.... I look forward to hearing from you. .... "
- Ivor Catt
|