Pepper

 

Accountability in Science

 

----- Original Message -----
From: <mjr36@cam.ac.uk>
To: "ivor catt" <icatt@btinternet.com>
Cc: <carol.gray@royalsoc.ac.uk>
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2006 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: Letter to Lord Rees

Dear Mr Catt,
I owe you an apology for not having responded earlier to your letter . I shall however need to get 'up to speed' on the scientific question you raise before being able to respond intelligently -- I doubt that I can offer any input beyond what you can get from the better-qualified Fellows of Trinity.
It was a great pleasure to meet you when you came to the College.

Best regards
Martin Rees

@@@@@@@@@@@@@

Ivor Catt, 121 Westfields,

St. Albans AL3 4JR, England.

15 August 2006

Lord Rees, Master,

Trinity College, Cambridge.

Dear Lord Rees,

Thank you for your email dated 6 August 2006, in reply to my email and letter dated 5 June 2006.

There is no need for you to get 'up to speed' on the scientific question. I approached you in your administrative capacity only.

I will outline The Catt Question again.

Outline of established theory. When a 12v battery is connected to a lamp, electric current flows into the lamp. Also, since the two connnecting wires are now at different voltages, negative charge appears on the surface of the lower wire to terminate the electric flux between the two wires.

 

One of the Fellows of your College says that that charge came from the battery. The other says that it came from inside the wire.

One of the Fellows of The Royal Society, of which you are President, says that that charge came from the battery. The other says that it came from inside the wire.

These gentlemen are not alone, but represent two large bodies of expert opinion.

You have a number of alternatives. I shall deal with Trinity College first, and then deal with The Royal Society.

 

Trinity College, of which you are Master.

1 Say that you have no relevant administrative duties or power in Trinity College. In which case, please advise me as to who has administrative responsibility..

2 Say that you regard the matter as unimportant.

3 Say that the two parties, Josephson and Pepper, have told you that either (a) they do not in fact disagree, or (b) the matter is unimportant.

4 See (4) below.

 

The Royal Society, of which you are President.

1 Say that you have no relevant administrative duties or power in The Royal Society. In which case, please advise me as to who has administrative responsibility.

2 Say that you regard the matter as unimportant

3 Say that the two parties, Howie and Pepper, have told you that either (a) they do not in fact disagree, or (b) the matter is unimportant.

4 Say that a Conference is required.

.....................................

The nature of such a Conference is as outlined on page 55 of the book which discusses The Catt Question , which is at http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/28anom.htm.

The book says that the Conference proceeds as follows; "An IEE Journal announces forthcoming discussion; discussion occurs; agreed summary of discussion is reported in an IEE Journal."

The conference can be held under the aegis of any relevant institution - The Royal Society, or Trinity College, or Cambridge University Engineering or Physics Department, or Cambridge University, or The Cavendish, or "Nature Physics", or other. As soon as such a conference is announced, the likes of May Chiao, Associate Editor of Nature Physics , will feel it safe to publish a Commentary on this major issue, which has a history of more than a quarter of a century.

Yours sincerely,

Ivor Catt 15 August 2006. Sent email and slomail.

 

cc May Chiao, Associate Editor of Nature Physics

Nature Publishing Group, The Macmillan Building, 4 Crinan Street, London N1 9XW TEL: +44 (0) 20 7833 4000,.

cc Professor Josephson, Trinity College, Cambridge.

cc Professor Pepper, Trinity College, Cambridge.

cc Professor Howie, 194 Huntingdon Rd., Cambridge

3dec06 Second copies of the above sent to Chiao, Josephson, Pepper, Howie

Catt on Cattq

 

Homepage | Electromagnetism1 | Old Website